21-09-2013, 10:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 22-09-2013, 12:26 AM by Tony Szamboti.)
I would like to mention some real world mainstream media experiences I have had due to my research into the building collapses and willingness to speak out about it.
Many of you here may have seen the appearance by Bob McIlvaine and myself on Geraldo Rivera's show in Nov. 2010 about the collapse of WTC 7. I am sure Geraldo did this in reminiscence of his show in 1975 concerning the first mainstream network showing of the Zapruder film. You can see the 8:11 clip here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP0Hs-v-uJ0
Geraldo Rivera did his part by showing WTC 7's collapse and highlighting the controversy. During the show he even admitted he may have been wrong to chastise 911 activists a few years before and was willing to change his position when given reason to do so. It was up to the general population to move it forward.
On Sept. 3rd of this year Bob and I went to New York City to be interviewed by Ben Swann for his Reality Check series. You can see that 13 minute clip here http://benswann.com/reality-check-more-a...nking-911/
Ben Swann did his part by showing WTC 7's collapse and the North Tower and pointing out the issues Bob and I raised. It is now up to the general population to move it forward.
I was also recently interviewed in my hometown of Philadelphia by KYW 1060 News Radio reporter Paul Kurtz after he contacted Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth and asked if there was someone local he could talk to about our position on the collapses. That radio piece can be seen here http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2013/09...de-center/
Paul Kurtz did his part by mentioning that there are over 2,000 architects and engineers who have a problem with the present official explanations for the WTC collapses, with WTC 7 being the first they want re-investigated and why. It is now up to the general population to move it forward.
On the way back on the train Bob was bemoaning the fact that the general population is remiss in not pushing for a real investigation. At first I made excuses for the average person, by saying things are being hidden from them, but had to acknowledge that there had been some coverage of the controversy and that it doesn't seem like a people's movement is strong enough to cause it to occur because there is so much conflicting information and the average person is overwhelmed and doesn't know what to think. I then even said it isn't likely unless there was a military coup.
Tolerating someone who is promoting impossibilities is part of the problem. It is actually what powerful perpetrators depend on to get away with these types of crimes. They just hire people willing to run interference for them by keeping it confused and to the point where many start thinking that we will never know. This is precisely what was done with the Kennedy assassination. However, these powerful people put their pants on the same way the rest of us do, and if the majority do not tolerate nonsense concerning these crimes, even if there are no indictments, the public illumination of the reality and exposure of the perpetrators will keep them in check and eliminate the deceptive myth they created to support their aims. The mainly Internet exposure of the collapses as controlled demolitions by architects and engineers, and things like the books on 911 by Professor David Ray Griffin and Kevin Ryan's book "Another Nineteen", will help in that vein. I often wonder what would have happened with the JFK case if Jim Garrison had the Internet to communicate with the general population. It is an arduous journey when fighting powerful perpetrators, and no one person can do it all. But there are small things we can all do, and one is to not tolerate nonsense like that spewed by the likes of Jeffrey Orling.
Many of you here may have seen the appearance by Bob McIlvaine and myself on Geraldo Rivera's show in Nov. 2010 about the collapse of WTC 7. I am sure Geraldo did this in reminiscence of his show in 1975 concerning the first mainstream network showing of the Zapruder film. You can see the 8:11 clip here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP0Hs-v-uJ0
Geraldo Rivera did his part by showing WTC 7's collapse and highlighting the controversy. During the show he even admitted he may have been wrong to chastise 911 activists a few years before and was willing to change his position when given reason to do so. It was up to the general population to move it forward.
On Sept. 3rd of this year Bob and I went to New York City to be interviewed by Ben Swann for his Reality Check series. You can see that 13 minute clip here http://benswann.com/reality-check-more-a...nking-911/
Ben Swann did his part by showing WTC 7's collapse and the North Tower and pointing out the issues Bob and I raised. It is now up to the general population to move it forward.
I was also recently interviewed in my hometown of Philadelphia by KYW 1060 News Radio reporter Paul Kurtz after he contacted Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth and asked if there was someone local he could talk to about our position on the collapses. That radio piece can be seen here http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2013/09...de-center/
Paul Kurtz did his part by mentioning that there are over 2,000 architects and engineers who have a problem with the present official explanations for the WTC collapses, with WTC 7 being the first they want re-investigated and why. It is now up to the general population to move it forward.
On the way back on the train Bob was bemoaning the fact that the general population is remiss in not pushing for a real investigation. At first I made excuses for the average person, by saying things are being hidden from them, but had to acknowledge that there had been some coverage of the controversy and that it doesn't seem like a people's movement is strong enough to cause it to occur because there is so much conflicting information and the average person is overwhelmed and doesn't know what to think. I then even said it isn't likely unless there was a military coup.
Tolerating someone who is promoting impossibilities is part of the problem. It is actually what powerful perpetrators depend on to get away with these types of crimes. They just hire people willing to run interference for them by keeping it confused and to the point where many start thinking that we will never know. This is precisely what was done with the Kennedy assassination. However, these powerful people put their pants on the same way the rest of us do, and if the majority do not tolerate nonsense concerning these crimes, even if there are no indictments, the public illumination of the reality and exposure of the perpetrators will keep them in check and eliminate the deceptive myth they created to support their aims. The mainly Internet exposure of the collapses as controlled demolitions by architects and engineers, and things like the books on 911 by Professor David Ray Griffin and Kevin Ryan's book "Another Nineteen", will help in that vein. I often wonder what would have happened with the JFK case if Jim Garrison had the Internet to communicate with the general population. It is an arduous journey when fighting powerful perpetrators, and no one person can do it all. But there are small things we can all do, and one is to not tolerate nonsense like that spewed by the likes of Jeffrey Orling.