22-09-2013, 12:54 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:While a minority view on JFK, I'm aware, I believe JFK had two 'marks' against him for which he was murdered on the public stage. Most agree on the first, that being his turn away from their control and toward democracy, Peace, Justice, something approximating the lip-service and Potemkin Constitution and Laws, etc. The second was that he, as many others of the time, was beginning that personal inner exploration, that 'they' know can all-too-often lead to freedom from control - all too dangerous for a President, dangerous as well for the Plebs.
Once again we find ourselves in the same minority -- although I would replace the word "beginning" with "continuing."
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene