22-09-2013, 01:03 PM
Tony Szamboti Wrote:[quote=Magda Hassan][quote=Tony Szamboti]
Oh, he is active alright, in the sense of trying to maintain confusion and preventing a real investigation of those who had access to the interiors of those buildings. The debate about it is over and that desperately needs to be done based on the evidence. If Jeffrey Orling is not an agent then he is an idiot, given the type of views he espouses in light of the clear evidence for controlled demolition, and shouldn't be given consideration either way.
I would like to know if anyone here would be willing to long suffer the nonsense proffered by Jeffrey Orling, and those like him, if a member of their family had been killed in those collapses, with serious evidence pointing to intentional demolition that was not further investigated.
Completely nonsense. In have advocated in the past and still do for a new complete technical investigation and use the findings to achieve justice and accountability. I believe there may have been a conspiracy to conceal some of the issues and provide cover for some who should be held accountable for their actions or professional (mis)conduct, incompetence and so forth. That needs to be determined.. it's conjecture. Like most people I deplore what was done in our name using 9/11 as a pretext. Calling someone an agent (of which agency??) or an idiot is not advancing the discussion. You and your associates might not like or agree with what I have put forth about the technical issues related to the WTC, but the slurs are not refutation. It's quite undignified.