Reasonable doubts about Lee Harvey Oswald

[David Josephs]

Thanks for the explanation. I have found refuting the DVP's of the world brings attention to the evidence. I understand many consider this a waste, but I feel someone should clean up the loose disinformation littering the Web by confronting them (I posted my article in a forum that DVP was a member of, and in the end he had no facts and allowed others to lose his fight for him) I respect your views, my methods I suppose may not similar to those here, but I using my standards of reasonable doubt with official a trove of official documents to prove it was not just Oswald, but the entire case and legal mechanism used was illegal and therefore should be set aside and investigated again. While some here operate at a deeper level on the intricacies of the case, many guests I would imagine are not as involved, simple legal precedents I find speak to them without years of prior study.

Mr. S.... I genuinely appreciate the effort and time as one who has spent many years with that mission.... even after I read the following
which I am posting under the assumption some, as you've said, have not:

"I'm afraid we were misled," (Vincent) Salandria said sadly. "All the critics, myself included, were misled very early. I see that now. We spent too much time and effort micro-analyzing the details of the assassination when all the time it was obvious, it was blatantly obvious that it was a conspiracy. Don't you think that the men who killed Kennedy had the means to do it in the most sophisticated and subtle way? They chose not to. Instead, they picked the shooting gallery that was Dealey Plaza and did it in the most barbarous and openly arrogant manner. The cover story was transparent and designed not to hold, to fall apart at the slightest scrutiny. The forces that killed Kennedy wanted the message clear: 'We are in control and no one -- not the President, nor Congress, nor any elected official -- no one can do anything about it.' It was a message to the people that their government was powerless. And the people eventually got the message. Consider what has happened since the Kennedy assassination. People see government today as unresponsive to their needs, yet the budget and power of the military and intelligence establishment have increased tremendously.

"The tyranny of power is here. Current events tell us that those who killed Kennedy can only perpetuate their power by* promoting social upheaval both at home and abroad. And that will lead not to revolution but to repression. I suggest to you, my friend, that the interests of those who killed Kennedy now transcend national boundaries and national priorities. No doubt we are dealing now with an international conspiracy. We must face that fact -- and not waste any more time micro-analyzing the evidence. That's exactly what they want us to do. They have kept us busy for so long. And I will bet, buddy, that is what will happen to you. They'll keep you very, very busy and, eventually, they'll wear you down."


Investigating the minutia leads us to understand the evidence itself holds the all the clues to the conspiracy we really need...

While the evidence of the actual crime lays within this screaming proof of conspiracy... which as we've agreed is woefully fraudulent.... we can still find the truth...


Consider this Mr. S,
Who has the power to get the Surgeon General of the Navy, and two Rear Admirals, one in charge of Bethesda Naval Hospital, the other the Presidents physician... to be party to the alteration/documentation of the wounds and not only never say a word but lie about it while ordering everyone else who was there, under court martial, never to say a word? Who?


What a Mr. Brennan has to say is minutia compared to the people who orchestrated that...
the difference between how the conspiracy worked and how the world works....

DJ