24-09-2013, 11:56 PM
http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20...ootage.htm
In the first part of this four-minute video on Corbett, WTC7 collapses--symmetrically, appearing to build speed (accelerate).
At the 2:00 mark, The North Tower similarly collapses symmetrically, with growing speed (accelerating).
Certainly dramatic in its impact, the video "appeared" in 2008, and presents the clearest view of two very suspicious events.
No other buildings have suffered such "natural" collapse.
Tony, your hypothesis bears examination: the removal of three floors of columns--coincidentally the length of the columns involved--appears necessary to initiate collapse--otherwise the damaged buildings would have remained standing.
The Commission insisted heat weakening and mechanical damage were responsible.
Evidence suggests the official explanation fails to explain.
In the first part of this four-minute video on Corbett, WTC7 collapses--symmetrically, appearing to build speed (accelerate).
At the 2:00 mark, The North Tower similarly collapses symmetrically, with growing speed (accelerating).
Certainly dramatic in its impact, the video "appeared" in 2008, and presents the clearest view of two very suspicious events.
No other buildings have suffered such "natural" collapse.
Tony, your hypothesis bears examination: the removal of three floors of columns--coincidentally the length of the columns involved--appears necessary to initiate collapse--otherwise the damaged buildings would have remained standing.
The Commission insisted heat weakening and mechanical damage were responsible.
Evidence suggests the official explanation fails to explain.