28-09-2013, 02:49 PM
This seems to be the problem in understanding 9/11. Everyone embraces the ideas that when you connect the "dots" the picture emerges explaining what appear to be disparate and separate bits of information. This is often how crimes and mysteries are solved.... piecing together evidence... connecting the evidence "dots".
The zodiac is an example of a nonsense connecting the dots exercise... The stars which make up Orion have hardly anything to do with each other. When viewed from almost any other location in the universe the pattern which we see as Orion would not resemble Orion at all. So there is no Orion... it is a collection of dots (stars) we connect because we choose to see Orion (from our location on earth in our local galaxy), the hunter in Greek MYTHOLOGY. Note the word MYTH in mythology.
There are many puzzles to be solved when we look at the events of 9/11. There are political forces and there were the physical technical events which know no politics. Observers clearly seem to be selecting the bits they choose as significant and then draw connections between them. Some will call this process cherry picking. It's no different than what the early Greeks did when they looked to the stars which they clearly did not understand as we do today. They were ignorant about astronomy and so they came up with astrology, a seemingly coherent system made out of whole cloth. But it was convincing to the naive/ignorant people of the time. The underlying concept of astrology is so absurd it's amazing that anyone would pay heed to it today now that we have more understanding of the universe we inhabit. How do heavenly bodies influence personality and character based on the moment one pops out the birth canal and the geographic location on earth? Certainly it's not measurable or connected to personality development.
In the case of 9/11 there are so many dots to choose from and there are lots which are missing or not obvious for any number of reasons. The missing ones we would call missing data and evidence. And when it's not there, we try to explain why we don't have those data.
One common aspect of criminal behavior... is the criminal's need to get away with their crime. So the clever criminal will attempt to both leave little incriminating evidence, or leave decoys and fake evidence or evidence which points to someone else and definitely away from them. Accidents or physical events don't engage in such schemes.
Many who look at 9/11 as a crime expect that the conspirators were up to this sort of deception. They project that the entire event was part of the crime "scheme" all planned and carried out in minute detail and some assert the plans go back for decades. They will then connect some dots in support of this notion and call it a false flag. They see all the signs of this sort of deception. Why? Just like the Greeks who wanted to see their gods in the heavens (where else would gods hang out but in a place called "the heavens")... those who believe 9/11 was an inside job... a criminal conspiracy... look for the signs OF THAT criminal conspiracy.... You hear things such as... their failure to do a proper fire investigation or look for explosives... or they removed all the incriminating evidence from the steel frame and so on.
Everyone is trying to figure out which dots to connect and which are significant and which are not. Was the steel actually whisked away to destroy evidence? Or was it removed for some other purpose such as recovery of victims... and sold for scrap? What should they have done with 300,000 tons of bent and mangled steel designed for those structures? How much of it should have been saved to study? How important was the recovery of remains as opposed to preserving a "crime scene'?
Houston.. we have a dot connecting problem. Choose your dots and it frames your beliefs. Or what also seems to be present is... Look for the dots which support your beliefs. There are so many dots there, so many missing, so many confusing that dot collectors can building any narraritive they want. And they do... and the narratives will make perfect sense because once the dots are connected... there is a logical consistency to them. How could anyone deny it?
When you realize how lost the explanation has become in connecting the dots exercises, you realize that it's all hardly different from the Greeks who needed to see their gods in the sky. They saw what they wanted to see... what confirmed their world view however good or bad it was.
Step right up and connect the dots...
The zodiac is an example of a nonsense connecting the dots exercise... The stars which make up Orion have hardly anything to do with each other. When viewed from almost any other location in the universe the pattern which we see as Orion would not resemble Orion at all. So there is no Orion... it is a collection of dots (stars) we connect because we choose to see Orion (from our location on earth in our local galaxy), the hunter in Greek MYTHOLOGY. Note the word MYTH in mythology.
There are many puzzles to be solved when we look at the events of 9/11. There are political forces and there were the physical technical events which know no politics. Observers clearly seem to be selecting the bits they choose as significant and then draw connections between them. Some will call this process cherry picking. It's no different than what the early Greeks did when they looked to the stars which they clearly did not understand as we do today. They were ignorant about astronomy and so they came up with astrology, a seemingly coherent system made out of whole cloth. But it was convincing to the naive/ignorant people of the time. The underlying concept of astrology is so absurd it's amazing that anyone would pay heed to it today now that we have more understanding of the universe we inhabit. How do heavenly bodies influence personality and character based on the moment one pops out the birth canal and the geographic location on earth? Certainly it's not measurable or connected to personality development.
In the case of 9/11 there are so many dots to choose from and there are lots which are missing or not obvious for any number of reasons. The missing ones we would call missing data and evidence. And when it's not there, we try to explain why we don't have those data.
One common aspect of criminal behavior... is the criminal's need to get away with their crime. So the clever criminal will attempt to both leave little incriminating evidence, or leave decoys and fake evidence or evidence which points to someone else and definitely away from them. Accidents or physical events don't engage in such schemes.
Many who look at 9/11 as a crime expect that the conspirators were up to this sort of deception. They project that the entire event was part of the crime "scheme" all planned and carried out in minute detail and some assert the plans go back for decades. They will then connect some dots in support of this notion and call it a false flag. They see all the signs of this sort of deception. Why? Just like the Greeks who wanted to see their gods in the heavens (where else would gods hang out but in a place called "the heavens")... those who believe 9/11 was an inside job... a criminal conspiracy... look for the signs OF THAT criminal conspiracy.... You hear things such as... their failure to do a proper fire investigation or look for explosives... or they removed all the incriminating evidence from the steel frame and so on.
Everyone is trying to figure out which dots to connect and which are significant and which are not. Was the steel actually whisked away to destroy evidence? Or was it removed for some other purpose such as recovery of victims... and sold for scrap? What should they have done with 300,000 tons of bent and mangled steel designed for those structures? How much of it should have been saved to study? How important was the recovery of remains as opposed to preserving a "crime scene'?
Houston.. we have a dot connecting problem. Choose your dots and it frames your beliefs. Or what also seems to be present is... Look for the dots which support your beliefs. There are so many dots there, so many missing, so many confusing that dot collectors can building any narraritive they want. And they do... and the narratives will make perfect sense because once the dots are connected... there is a logical consistency to them. How could anyone deny it?
When you realize how lost the explanation has become in connecting the dots exercises, you realize that it's all hardly different from the Greeks who needed to see their gods in the sky. They saw what they wanted to see... what confirmed their world view however good or bad it was.
Step right up and connect the dots...