29-09-2013, 09:14 AM
Jeffrey
At 628 you use red font to say the same things you've said for years, namely
heat weakening and runaway collapse
You use the term "jumbo jet" but these weren't 747s
You say the structures were designed to withstand a 707--but they didn't withstand these planes
Your runaway model requires removal of several floors which wasn't done by heat insufficient to weaken steel
Where's the 2300 degrees?
What removed the several floors?
You parallel the official explanation which does not explain
You say it looks like collapse--to be sure
It just doesn't look like the product of half the temperature required to weaken steel
Three buildings collapsed: two from collisions of planes within design parameters sans temperatures of 2300 degrees
One without any plane collision, seen to be perfectly symmetrical
Red font to the contrary notwithstanding, the official explanation does not explain
Unprecedented collapse despite insufficient heat to weaken steel
At 628 you use red font to say the same things you've said for years, namely
heat weakening and runaway collapse
You use the term "jumbo jet" but these weren't 747s
You say the structures were designed to withstand a 707--but they didn't withstand these planes
Your runaway model requires removal of several floors which wasn't done by heat insufficient to weaken steel
Where's the 2300 degrees?
What removed the several floors?
You parallel the official explanation which does not explain
You say it looks like collapse--to be sure
It just doesn't look like the product of half the temperature required to weaken steel
Three buildings collapsed: two from collisions of planes within design parameters sans temperatures of 2300 degrees
One without any plane collision, seen to be perfectly symmetrical
Red font to the contrary notwithstanding, the official explanation does not explain
Unprecedented collapse despite insufficient heat to weaken steel