30-09-2013, 01:26 PM
Tony Szamboti Wrote:It is hard to believe they were errors and not intentional deceptions.
There were flange to web stiffeners at the end of the girder between columns 44 and 79 in WTC 7 that would have made their initiating event of girder walk-off in the northeast corner under floor 13 impossible. The stiffeners are shown on drawing #9114 but are nowhere to be found in the report and were left out of the NIST analysis. How come?
I would encourage everyone here to see this short video about it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz7v8EgCzJM so you can see what is going on in a clear way for yourself.
This is similar to Jerry Ford moving the JFK back wound up to the "back of the neck" in the Warren Report, to make it work with the single bullet theory, when in reality it was well below that at 5.5" below the collar on his back. Of course, in the WTC 7 case the public didn't have the drawings and in the JFK case the public didn't have the autopsy report showing the actual location of the back wound, until years after the reports were issued.
This omission makes the NIST WTC 7 report invalid by itself and there is more.
Indeed it's hard to believe that the mistakes in the published reports were oversights and some how not intentional. But of course accepting that the mistakes were part of a deception, one can't know what they deception was intended to conceal. The truth movement ASSUMES that the intent was to cover for the CD/inside job/ false flag. There are other explanations for the assumed *deception*. I have offered one which simply stated is that the wrong explanation conceals a series of decisions, which may constitute all manner of corruption, and professional misconduct and subject the designers, developers, etc. to wrongful death lawsuits, profession misconduct and expose powerful people to accountability.
There certainly is a pattern in the country of the powerful well connected protected their *own*... whether it is the blue line of silence or the more recent example of the failure to hold the Wall Street accountable for the crash of the mortgage economy. Commissions are made up of insiders who can't seem to find any insiders culpable of misconduct. The best we heard was a cryptic remark that the commission was set up to fail and did not tell the whole story.
Ironically, the same group who are the targets of the truth movement conspiracists are the same group (class) who has benefited and escaped any accountability for their actions. But this class is always benefiting from disasters... and they don't cause all disasters... that is unless you hold the people who brought us nuclear power (industry) as responsible for Three Mile Island and Fukishima. If I recall correctly, not one faced any sanctions/accountablity when those plants *failed*. See a pattern?