06-10-2013, 05:43 AM
Its incredible to me that either Morris or Tink left out the Latino appearing man from the discussion.
When, in fact, to me that is crucial.
I really wonder if Tink did leave him out or Morris did. One way to clear the air would be for Morris to show the whole long interview with Tink.
I mean Thompson has been a PI for decades. And somehow he missed the fact they were next to each other? Then sat next to each other after and it looks like the Latino had a radio in his hand and talked into it? And that is not important Tink?
I really hope that Tink did mention it and Morris cut it for the NY TImes.
But heck, Tink is the same guy who said Garrison was up a tree in 1967 because he said the assassination was a coup de'tat.
So maybe Tink bought Blakey also. Even though part of Blakey's agenda was to discredit the critics. And this fit that agenda perfectly.
I mean with Morris' help, and Tink's, the NY Times is still using it. I suppose its just a coincidence that the Times published Blakey's book.
When, in fact, to me that is crucial.
I really wonder if Tink did leave him out or Morris did. One way to clear the air would be for Morris to show the whole long interview with Tink.
I mean Thompson has been a PI for decades. And somehow he missed the fact they were next to each other? Then sat next to each other after and it looks like the Latino had a radio in his hand and talked into it? And that is not important Tink?
I really hope that Tink did mention it and Morris cut it for the NY TImes.
But heck, Tink is the same guy who said Garrison was up a tree in 1967 because he said the assassination was a coup de'tat.
So maybe Tink bought Blakey also. Even though part of Blakey's agenda was to discredit the critics. And this fit that agenda perfectly.
I mean with Morris' help, and Tink's, the NY Times is still using it. I suppose its just a coincidence that the Times published Blakey's book.