Anthony Summers

[Albert Doyle]

Is there a more reliable or concise LN site than McAdams'? Let me know what it is. I'll cross-check there.

I agree. To date, McAdams's spin has not fared well against the assertions of DiEugenio. But at least his site spares me the trouble and expense of buying Bugliosi's tome. The first thing I cross-checked was 544 Camp Street. And I already gave my opinion of McAdams' spin on that.

McAdams is a lying disinformationist whose premise is working plausible excuses around the conspiracy evidence. You are already correctly detecting that they come up short on Garrison and 544 Camp because they are lying and trying to deny that which is obviously true.

You are proposing an oxymoron when you refer to any Lone Nut site as being "concise or reliable". No such animal. If you argue with Lone Nutters long enough you'll see they are deliberately evading the truth with false arguments.