08-11-2013, 07:25 PM
"Some issues within JFK research represent litmus tests that separate the competent from the frivolous, the courageous from the cowardly, and the honest from the dishonest, where some estimates have gone so far as to suggest that as much as 95% of members of the JFK research community are promoting an agenda to sow confusion and uncertainty, even in those cases where the evidence for a conclusion has made the question beyond reasonable doubt, precisely because, once the evidence has been properly understood, no alternative explanation is reasonable."
Wow, first time I've seen this thread. That Fetzer considers 95% of the JFK research community to be disinformation artists shows a real Maoist/Khmer Rouge-like mentality at work.
No, if anyone was sent to sow confusion and uncertainty in the JFK community, it has been people who insist that everything was faked and then demand party-line adherence to this idea.
Wow, first time I've seen this thread. That Fetzer considers 95% of the JFK research community to be disinformation artists shows a real Maoist/Khmer Rouge-like mentality at work.
No, if anyone was sent to sow confusion and uncertainty in the JFK community, it has been people who insist that everything was faked and then demand party-line adherence to this idea.