12-11-2013, 05:40 PM
Tracy Riddle Wrote:Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Summers' mealy mouth qualifications are really disturbing.
As is his insistence on a very small conspiracy, --if there is one-and its mafia orientation.
That is not what the best of the vast majority of the researchers think. Not by a longshot.
In fact, none of the best of the recent outlines that: Douglass, Newman, McKnight, Talbot, etc. ANd none of the declassified files indicates that either.
What the heck did the Mafia have to do with Mexico City or the autopsy? Or Clinton-Jackson?
Oh, I forgot, that didn't happen, dozens of people were lying--before the assassination..
I think Summers has always leaned toward that conclusion.
Also, how could the Mob cancel the photographers' vehicle, and rearrange motorcycles, key vehicles and people in the motorcade?
Yes Tracey I have always felt the same way. I have read the two first editions of his book, and I think there was some great stuff. However, by the second he was dishing on Garrison... yet still using all the stuff Garrison had dug up.
As for Marty Hay you jealous little bastard lol!::bowtie::
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992