02-12-2013, 06:02 PM
Erm what precisely have you not seen done? Research into faux coffins and faux alterations? You have me there, that stuff has never been discussed before has it? Except by John Hankey, Jim Fetzer, and a little fellow with a big roar, and a crap reputation David Lifton.
Essentially your whole theory is based on Tom Robinsons Comment about the autopsy surgeons enlarged the head wound. Well of course they did; how else can you get the brains out. Humes even testified to sawing the head. Yawn!!!!!!
Here's the testimony.
Dr. HUMES: ...To better examine the situation with regard to the skull, at this time, Boswell and I extended the lacerations of the scalp which were at the margins of this wound, down in the direction of both of the President's ears. At that point, we had even a better appreciation of the extensive damage which had been done to the skull by this injury. We had to do virtually no work with a saw to remove these Portions of the skull, they came apart in our hands very easily, and we attempted to further examine the brain, and seek specifically this fragment which was the one we felt to be of a size which would permit us to recover it. (2H354)
Read Roger Feinman, Weisberg, and Harrison Livingstone's demolitions of Lifton's stuff. There is nothing fresh about your questions in any manner. You are clearly pushing an agenda. Nonetheless, I am glad you read our stuff at CTKA. However, I do not know if you take much in. The reason being I can see in this thread here.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...py5u8Snoeo
Anyhow, must run Dave. I am a little more open to the possibility of some photographic alterations than Marty. However, the type of Liftonesque stuff you are punting for is not worth talking about.
Essentially your whole theory is based on Tom Robinsons Comment about the autopsy surgeons enlarged the head wound. Well of course they did; how else can you get the brains out. Humes even testified to sawing the head. Yawn!!!!!!
Here's the testimony.
Dr. HUMES: ...To better examine the situation with regard to the skull, at this time, Boswell and I extended the lacerations of the scalp which were at the margins of this wound, down in the direction of both of the President's ears. At that point, we had even a better appreciation of the extensive damage which had been done to the skull by this injury. We had to do virtually no work with a saw to remove these Portions of the skull, they came apart in our hands very easily, and we attempted to further examine the brain, and seek specifically this fragment which was the one we felt to be of a size which would permit us to recover it. (2H354)
Read Roger Feinman, Weisberg, and Harrison Livingstone's demolitions of Lifton's stuff. There is nothing fresh about your questions in any manner. You are clearly pushing an agenda. Nonetheless, I am glad you read our stuff at CTKA. However, I do not know if you take much in. The reason being I can see in this thread here.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...py5u8Snoeo
Anyhow, must run Dave. I am a little more open to the possibility of some photographic alterations than Marty. However, the type of Liftonesque stuff you are punting for is not worth talking about.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992