28-12-2013, 04:28 PM
I admire DiEugenio so much that if he asked me to shine his shoes with my shirt before a conference I'd probably do it, however I was confused to see these passages appearing:
I read somewhere that Dallas Police had an encounter with Oswald previously where they learned he was intel. If this is true it could be feasible that the reason Baker first omitted Oswald from his report was because he was either ordered to until they could figure it out, or acted on his own volition. If you think about it this isn't that far-fetched since we know the real relationship between Dallas PD and the Carousel with which Oswald was associated. Also, some of DiEugenio's own writings place Oswald in the lunchroom according to Carolyn Arnold's witnessing.
Now we have fully resurrected Ralph Cinque and Professor Fetzer's claim. When I told Seamus soon we'll see DiEugenio's picture on Cinque's website I was joking. Now I'm wondering. Only this time we are switching from their nutty transposition of Lovelady to having Oswald in the shadowy corner. But this conflicts with the timing of Oswald being in the lunchroom. A couple of things to note is Darnell is after the shooting when Lovelady switched to the right side of the steps. During the shooting I don't think you'll find any image that shows any obvious soda and sandwich. What this comes down to in my mind is whether we can believe all those in view of Prayer Man would keep their mouths shut about it being Oswald. Not only would Lovelady have a clear view of Oswald in the Darnell shot, but is it likely after being questioned about the Altgens controversy that he would keep his mouth shut after having a clear view of Prayer Man while standing on the right side of the steps? Also, I know when I'm in a group and I see something remarkable I have a habit of turning around to see the others who witnessed it sort of like an involuntary "Did you see that too?" reflex. If Oswald was out there on the steps during the shooting I can't believe no one scanned him. You're losing me with this. I'm just waiting for Fetzer to revise and say Doorway Man was actually Prayer Man along with a whole new set of bizarre alteration reasons supporting it.
As to the rest, thank goodness for DiEugenio who basically rides these FOX historians out of town tarred and feathered on a rail like they deserve.
Quote:It has been questioned by some because Baker never mentioned the incident, or Oswald, in his first day affidavit. Even though when he made out the affidavit, Oswald was sitting right across from him in the witness room at Dallas Police headquarters. (James DiEugenio, Reclaiming Parkland,pgs. 192-96)
I read somewhere that Dallas Police had an encounter with Oswald previously where they learned he was intel. If this is true it could be feasible that the reason Baker first omitted Oswald from his report was because he was either ordered to until they could figure it out, or acted on his own volition. If you think about it this isn't that far-fetched since we know the real relationship between Dallas PD and the Carousel with which Oswald was associated. Also, some of DiEugenio's own writings place Oswald in the lunchroom according to Carolyn Arnold's witnessing.
Quote:But researcher Sean Murphy has gone beyond that. He argues, with compelling evidence and logic that, at the time of the assassination, Oswald was most likely outside the building. Standing back in the alcove of the Houston street doorway with his sandwich and soda pop. In the Darnell film, this image has been termed "Prayer Man", because of the position of the subject's hands in still shots. The man next to this figure, and a step above him, is Wesley Frazier. Needless to say, if this figure is actually Oswald, not only is the Warren Commission shown to be a complete fraud, but also the worst suspicions about Frazier being suborned are also true.
Now we have fully resurrected Ralph Cinque and Professor Fetzer's claim. When I told Seamus soon we'll see DiEugenio's picture on Cinque's website I was joking. Now I'm wondering. Only this time we are switching from their nutty transposition of Lovelady to having Oswald in the shadowy corner. But this conflicts with the timing of Oswald being in the lunchroom. A couple of things to note is Darnell is after the shooting when Lovelady switched to the right side of the steps. During the shooting I don't think you'll find any image that shows any obvious soda and sandwich. What this comes down to in my mind is whether we can believe all those in view of Prayer Man would keep their mouths shut about it being Oswald. Not only would Lovelady have a clear view of Oswald in the Darnell shot, but is it likely after being questioned about the Altgens controversy that he would keep his mouth shut after having a clear view of Prayer Man while standing on the right side of the steps? Also, I know when I'm in a group and I see something remarkable I have a habit of turning around to see the others who witnessed it sort of like an involuntary "Did you see that too?" reflex. If Oswald was out there on the steps during the shooting I can't believe no one scanned him. You're losing me with this. I'm just waiting for Fetzer to revise and say Doorway Man was actually Prayer Man along with a whole new set of bizarre alteration reasons supporting it.
As to the rest, thank goodness for DiEugenio who basically rides these FOX historians out of town tarred and feathered on a rail like they deserve.