06-01-2014, 09:12 PM
Daniel Gallup Wrote:Feister's work depends on the authenticity of the Z-film, which, after Horne's Inside the ARRB and other works, is very much a debatable point. Her particular form of psychobabble regarding the limo stop has all the depth of a parking-lot puddle.
Without taking an opinion on Feister, to me Crenshaw's insistence on witnessing a tangential wound that entered near the front right temple and exited through the infamous McClelland wound automatically qualifies the legitimacy of the Zapruder Film to the degree of making even Fetzer's claims possible. This wound was witnessed by Pitzer and Dennis David. The reason they probably left the back and to the left jerk in the final film is because they couldn't get away with removing that much, so they buried it at LIFE instead. Pat Speer fails to realize Hill looked down into this wound in the limo and the nurse at Parkland failed to see any damage to the parietal area.
Daniel Gallup Wrote:I would say DiEugenio's failure to credit Horne is the far more egregious omission, but then, alas, Horne is a "Liftonite." Certainly DiEugenio's State of the Case is a good effort, but to this reader very much an incomplete account.
DiEugenio's Destiny Betrayed is a cracking of the case and exoneration of Garrison. Horne cracks the autopsy evidence by showing the falsified brain evidence at Bethesda is proof of conspiracy at the government level. This is important because it excludes some of the popular false sponsor suspects who couldn't have controlled the cover-up inside Bethesda.