11-01-2014, 04:43 PM
Jim Hargrove Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Most researchers believe that Oswald was impersonated by someone in Mexico City (the phone call in broken Russian is definitely an impersonation). Even Hoover told LBJ that someone was impersonating LHO at the embassy. I suspect the typed letter to the Russian embassy was also done by someone else. This was all part of the effort to implicate the KGB and Castro in the upcoming assassination.
If we're to believe in the legitimacy of the Mexico City photos supplied by the Cuban government (to the HSCA) and the earlier photo supplied by the CIA in '63, there were two different men impersonating Oswald (neither resembling the historic LHO). The Cuban picture shows a slight, blond-haired fellow matching descriptions of some consulate personnel (and maybe Sylvia Duran in her unaltered remarks). The CIA picture, supposedly from the Russian Embassy, shows a much larger fellow who kind of looks like a football player. Agree that the letter was probably a forgery to blame Castro and Cuba.
Jim
Yes jim. I am familiar with the imperonators, but see my above post.
Why is Oswald, 3 days after denying he was ever in Mexico City, then contradicting himself and admitting exactly what the file records claim? Going off of his brother's claims that his responses sounded "mechanical", is it possible Oswald was at some point after 11/22 "coached" himself on saying certain things? Or his he telling the "truth"? His statements regarding his method of travel home, Mrs. Paine, and a few other particulars lead me to the conclusion that Oswald is actually obfuscating "something" in his interrogations, as his story seems to make slight changes. At one point he even says, "It wasn't actually true as to how I got home". On top of his statements regarding Mrs. Paine, it seems indeed like he is obfuscating.