Dawn Meredith Wrote:I was told yesterday by Joan Mellen that there is also a document that refers to Lee Henry Oswald. She thinks it is an FBI document.
Dawn
Dawn, and please don't take this the wrong way, but I am surprised that this is news here - but perhaps it may be which is possibly why my thread went unresponsed.
"Lee HENRY Oswald" is actually THE NAME OF THE 201 FILE (you can read that at the top of the Mary Ferrell site for yourself
see here: http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...SetId=1095
This is the basis of my desire to seek out the Cronkite video (which if you look up above in red font, you will see i have found for you)
as the use of the name "Lee HENRY Oswald" by Cronkite (who immediately reverts back to "Harvey" in his next restatement of the name) is a STRONG indication that Cronkite (a known CIA asset) is reading either directly from Oswald's file, or otherwise from a script that used this file as the basis for it's text. It is prima facie evidence that the media was working complicit with the government in hanging Oswald out.
IT SHOULD BE NOTED that
a. i was in error in my original statement, the derivation of "Lee Henry Oswald" is NOT found in documents from his time in Russia. I believe it may solely exist with reference to (possibly the SINGULAR) use by the CIA regarding his activities in Mexico.
b. Further, the document is followed fairly immediately by a retraction of that claim, and the correction to "Lee HARVEY"
**HOWEVER**
There are many others who have long asserted that this original use of "Lee HENRY" was meant to be used by Angelton's CIS as an intelligence dangle or barium-pill or marked-card in order to track interest in LHO.
Peter Dale Scott discusses this at length here: http://www.assassinationweb.com/scottc.htm
There is a large discussion on Lee HENRY here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....topic=4023
and also over here: http://www.jfkessentials.com/forum/index.php?topic=67.0
However, outside of possibly 3 mentions on the internet itself (not in any above link) NO ONE seems to have really picked up the use of that name by Walter Cronkite immediately following Oswald's arrest.
Again, his use of that name is fairly damning of media complicity in painting his guilt.
BTW - Actual file page with "SUBJECT: LEE HENRY OSWALD" here: http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...elPageId=7
"It is believed that Oswald may be identical to Lee Henry Oswald"
Actually -- shows up MULTIPLE before correction ... again HERE: http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...elPageId=7
THIRD TIME HERE: http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...lPageId=10
again, says "probably identical to Lee HENRY Oswald" then gives HENRY Oswald's 201 file number: "201-289248"
FOURTH TIME HERE: http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...lPageId=13
Here is one with the FROM LINE BLANKED OUT (curious): http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...lPageId=14
THE MEMO CORRECTING THAT NAME TO "LEE HARVEY" *IS* ACTUALLY AN FBI MEMO that was sent to mexico,
HERE IS THAT CORRECTION MEMO CHANGING HIS NAME BACK TO "HARVEY" :
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...lPageId=14