24-02-2014, 08:25 PM
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:You miss the whole point here, Albert. It is not just that PM is not seen, recognized and remembered as Lee Harvey Oswald by the persons on the steps, including Frazier who appears to be looking directly at PM, it is that PM is not remembered by anyone. Of course, Frazier also claims not to recall seeing a white helmeted police officer run past him, either, on his way into the TSBD. This alone stretches the imagination almost to the breaking point.
You're just conflating speculation. Although I do agree Frazier isn't credible for many reasons, from the car pool to the Oswald walking down the Houston Street sidewalk.
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:As for the 2nd floor meeting with Baker, Truly and Oswald, it is quite apparent this meeting never actually took place. Baker makes no mention of it in his first day statement, only making a vague reference to stopping an employee on the 3rd or 4th floor who was seen walking away from the stair landing.
Do yourself a favour. Go to the Ed. Forum and read the thread.
I must have missed your response to my previous submission that Oswald was known to be a spook and was already recorded as having his statements concealed by the Dallas Police. It is very possible Baker either knew Oswald was a spook or someone told him to not mention him in his first affidavit. You forget that Oswald being in the lunchroom at 12:25 and then bridging over to 12:31:30 makes it likely he was there in between. There's witnesses for that. Your theory, on the other hand, has Oswald taking a long route of exposure for which there is zero witnessing. Why is it that you quote the Victoria Adams' witnessing of Oswald's absence yet ignore this conspicuous absence?
Another easily understandable explanation for Baker's lack of mention of Oswald in his first affidavit is a rather obvious one isn't it? He was told not to mention the encounter because it exonerated Oswald and put him in a place at a time that history proved he couldn't have gotten to from the 6th Floor. It's very easily explained as being proof of the ongoing conspiracy that was trying frame Oswald in advance.
In my repeated posting of the number of people who would absolutely have to had stared Oswald right in the face in the Darnell Film I have yet to see you give a direct answer to that. It's beyond statistical possibility that that many persons would be exposed to Oswald standing right out in the open and not say anything. It really doesn't go past this if you use common sense (in my opinion).
I have read the Education Forum thread. It contains no more valid evidence than this thread.
I have a very good eye. If you look closely in the Darnell motion clip at the very end you can see the outline of Prayer Man's hands in contrast to the background. There's no bottle in his hand.