26-02-2014, 09:32 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Cliff Varnell Wrote:I regard the subject as the Grand Rabbit Hole in the case. The JFK critical research community has its collective head so far up JFK's unknowable head wound(s?) it can't see daylight...
The way I see it is Horne and Crenshaw have pretty much put the correct intepretation to the head wounds. Speer and Von Pein are just taking advantage of the conflicts that arise by giving credibility to the results of the wound alteration. However once the Bethesda pre-autopsy is placed in correct context it solves everything. Speer and Von Pein ignore it.
How many times was JFK shot in the head?
Once? Twice? Thrice?
Was there pre-autopsy surgery to the head?
Lots of reasons to believe so but we still don't know who did it where or when, if it happened at all.
&So research into the medical evidence has all the air sucked out of it by a study of unknowable things, paying relatively little attention to the back and throat wounds which are eminently knowable.
Strange hobby, is the best I can say of the head wound(s?) research.