27-02-2014, 05:52 PM
Cliff Varnell Wrote:How many times was JFK shot in the head?
If you think about it the correct answer is "As many times as they needed to do a pre-autopsy to cover it up". Cliff, don't fall for the Von Pein, Amazon book review troll demand for perfect evidence. I keep telling people once you have reasonable evidence of government malfeasance the standard for evidence drops significantly in your favor. You then have to come up with a lot less evidence to make your case. You no longer have to worry about it, the government criminals who murdered Kennedy do.
Cliff Varnell Wrote:Was there pre-autopsy surgery to the head?
I think Lifton and Horne have presented cases that deserve more respect than this. I believe most researchers already know the answers that there was visible surgery noted at the official autopsy and remarkably different wounds than those witnessed at Parkland. The answer is, yes, absolutely. In fact Pitzer most-likely recorded it and was murdered for it.
Cliff Varnell Wrote:Lots of reasons to believe so but we still don't know who did it where or when, if it happened at all.
In my opinion the Horne evidence is beyond reasonable doubt. The brain evidence is conclusive and you can back-track from there. What is your point, that there might be veracity to the Warren Report version?
Cliff Varnell Wrote:&So research into the medical evidence has all the air sucked out of it by a study of unknowable things, paying relatively little attention to the back and throat wounds which are eminently knowable.
Strange hobby, is the best I can say of the head wound(s?) research.
I think describing the Horne evidence as "unknowable" isn't respectful enough of what has already been shown. In my opinion they are all valid and all accumulative to the evidence. Researchers should be less defensive of their pet theories and more open-minded about the total evidence.