Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Donald Manning]

Outside of the fact the evidence points to Stanton and PM being on opposite sides of the entrance, you might have a case. ::headbang::

Alongside that, the images show no hint of the figure being a woman other than this idea that it's holding a purse(or a gun for all we know right?), around forty other researchers completely satisfied it's a male, most likely from the hairline I suppose, also shoulders, stance, "dress" and build.
I'll guess it's holding a gun okay, so now it's a shooter. Same logic. Hi Duncan.


As for no witnesses.
Twenty four seconds. That's the time he is on film in the doorway.
Motorcade hit the intersection about ten seconds before that Wiegman evidence.
Let's say a minute and with that he follows Baker inside.
It's not that big of a deal for me and I'm far from believing it yet let alone convinced.

Frazier must have seen him standing there but really that's all and we see him look at PM a[U]fter the shooting
[/U]only just but that's all Fritz would need.

"If you insist on giving him an alibi then sign the confession".
Easier to picture than Frazier actually standing up to him.
PM's there for a minute and Frazier looks at him.
That's all.


Can you believe one of these witnesses actually went back inside to grab lunch and had no clue what had happened? Amazing.
How about twenty of them? Thirty? I know, crazy.

How about 99% of those in Darnell and Weigman had no clue?
Impossible?
I mean even Frazier knew a shooting when he heard one, right?


Charles Hester.
Sitting on a bench, while his wife stands next to it.
He says he felt he was in the direct line of fire, yes that's what he said, quite a powerful statement.
Yet the Wfilm says he only reacted after the Newmans hit the deck.
That is, he sat there while he and his wife were "in the line of fire" and for about seven seconds after that explosion inside the limo.

From the Unger collection.


Now that's what I call ridiclus.