11-03-2014, 12:39 AM
I've been asked a number of time how whoever planned this "look-alike" program would know that these two boys would look alike later in life
when it DAWNed on me... (shout out to a new friend)
They didn't.
They[B] choose H&L much later in the equation (around the time they entered the marines - whatever the "plan" was) since they looked alike. H&L would be used for some "operation", and then what they did was to go back to recreate his history with his caretaker providing the images of the younger HARVEY, which are virtually all blurry and/or hard to make out... [/B]as opposed to trying to find children that looked alike.
The same holds true for Margeurite - History was created to support the present.
There are woefully few photos of HARVEY betweenthe ages of 13 and 17... by 18 they did indeed look alike.. Yet how often would their two images be side-by-side from 1956 thru 1963? Never.
The chronology of the book is what kept me in the linear mindset... and I think it is the opposite of how we have to think about it.
By revisiting my timeline spreadsheet I find that over and over HARVEY's history is very vague yet pops up in conflict to the actual places LEE was starting in NYC.
What we, I need to do is remember that it is the CREATION of this fraudulent history that comprises the evidence..
It could have been created and merged as needed... like the Youth House records not matching the school records... that was HARVEY's past, not LEE.
Fixing the evidence of History to conform to what it needs to be is vastly easier than hoping two children wind up looking the similar...
I am very excited about this... and those here who specialize in understanding the operations of the CIA, ONI and the Cold War may be more willing to take a stand on the subject
when we approach from the present looking BACKWARD...
DJ
when it DAWNed on me... (shout out to a new friend)
They didn't.
They[B] choose H&L much later in the equation (around the time they entered the marines - whatever the "plan" was) since they looked alike. H&L would be used for some "operation", and then what they did was to go back to recreate his history with his caretaker providing the images of the younger HARVEY, which are virtually all blurry and/or hard to make out... [/B]as opposed to trying to find children that looked alike.
The same holds true for Margeurite - History was created to support the present.
There are woefully few photos of HARVEY betweenthe ages of 13 and 17... by 18 they did indeed look alike.. Yet how often would their two images be side-by-side from 1956 thru 1963? Never.
The chronology of the book is what kept me in the linear mindset... and I think it is the opposite of how we have to think about it.
By revisiting my timeline spreadsheet I find that over and over HARVEY's history is very vague yet pops up in conflict to the actual places LEE was starting in NYC.
What we, I need to do is remember that it is the CREATION of this fraudulent history that comprises the evidence..
It could have been created and merged as needed... like the Youth House records not matching the school records... that was HARVEY's past, not LEE.
Fixing the evidence of History to conform to what it needs to be is vastly easier than hoping two children wind up looking the similar...
I am very excited about this... and those here who specialize in understanding the operations of the CIA, ONI and the Cold War may be more willing to take a stand on the subject
when we approach from the present looking BACKWARD...
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter