14-03-2014, 12:45 AM
David,
You may be right. The CIA plotters who set up "Oswald" as the fall guy may well have been following the commands of others. But I can't prove it and neither can you.
What we can prove, at the very least, is the CIA looked and behaved damned guilty. In your search for Deep connections elsewhere, why take the spotlight off the CIA?
Why let the CIA go? Why madly point everywhere else?
Direct evidence for the assassination points to the CIA. You can do all the Deep Political Thinking you want, but the EVIDENCE still points to the CIA.
If you have evidence against ONI or McGeorge Bundy or LBJ or Hoover or Curtis Lemay or the ghost of Marilyn Monroe, please post it here in the clearest and simplest terms possible.
And if you want to run with body alteration at Bethesda, be my guest, and lots of luck winning over the public with that.
Why not start squeezing the one organization we can definitely show was involved?
You may be right. The CIA plotters who set up "Oswald" as the fall guy may well have been following the commands of others. But I can't prove it and neither can you.
What we can prove, at the very least, is the CIA looked and behaved damned guilty. In your search for Deep connections elsewhere, why take the spotlight off the CIA?
Why let the CIA go? Why madly point everywhere else?
Direct evidence for the assassination points to the CIA. You can do all the Deep Political Thinking you want, but the EVIDENCE still points to the CIA.
If you have evidence against ONI or McGeorge Bundy or LBJ or Hoover or Curtis Lemay or the ghost of Marilyn Monroe, please post it here in the clearest and simplest terms possible.
And if you want to run with body alteration at Bethesda, be my guest, and lots of luck winning over the public with that.
Why not start squeezing the one organization we can definitely show was involved?