Q re Harvey and Lee

[David Josephs]

Probably a good time to return to Harvey and Lee on-topic now.

Admittedly, I have not read John Armstrong's Harvey & Lee, although I am sure I have read quotes as well as analysis of various parts of the story. But, I do wonder, as I wander, about the voice and/or accent and speech patterns of Lee versus Harvey. I would think that his older brother Robert would have noticed anything different. I do believe that at least one imposter was using the Lee H Oswald identidy prior to, and possibly including, 11/22/63-11/24/63.
I also believe, as posted by Mr Josephs, a considerable amount of "Harvey & Lee" history was very possibly "created" after the fact, on paper.
AS for school records and school years, during the 1950s, in at least part of Texas, the traditional school year began in early September and continued through late May, followed by a 3 month summer break. Alternately, for persons born, I think, between September and January, a seperate school year started and went from January to the next January, with the 3 month summer break halfway through each grade level. This continued at least into the 1960s as well. I don't know exactly whether or not the alternate school year has any effect on the Oswald legend, but I do wonder, as I wander.

While much, imo, was created looking backward to cover a trail in order to create/cover an asset... there is no denying the forward movement of the timeline as well... who ever was setting HARVEY up from an early age to go from whoever he was to his HARVEY identity may not have cared what they looked like... nor the remembrances of Marge's past either... the time frames and changes would be plausible and only identifiable by a few...

Robert appears to have been in on the charade... John, not so much.

We cannot think of those times with 2014 technologies, although it is very hard not to. Photos could be doctored, documents created... there was no other means of comparing or identifying these two as they would not have been together by plan...

By the time technology catches up, the intended purposes and results would be long over... with things like the Garrison investigation and the early books dealt with as they always been... minimize, slander, and "marketing"....

If John's book ever caught on in mainstream, I shudder to think of the ringer he would be put thru...

The "best selling" of these books focuses on Bethesda and the conspiracy perpetrated there... with little mention of the CIA, ONI, DIA or anyone else for that matter.
And no mention at all of the Harvey and Lee conflicts in the evidence...

Focus the attention in one area to keep it away from another... the basic elements of illusion...

DJ