17-03-2014, 11:56 AM
Herb, stop the disinfo campaign by trying to malign Cyril Wecht and myself. You need a much stronger study of the forensic evidence before you start naïve threads about why the left hand side of the back of JFK's shirt was bloody. Just go back and to the left and re-read things.
Herbert Blenner Wrote:
[size=12][size=12]Naming Cyril Wecht as your champion destroys your case. I cite his participation on the Forensic Pathology Panel who presented the transverse wound on the back of President Kennedy. This wound earlier described by the Clark Panel as a 7 mm by 10 mm ellipse replaced the 4 mm by 7 mm longitudinal back wound reported by Humes during his WC testimony and autopsy report. So which way is it? Was Wecht too incompetent to catch this replacement of small longitudinal wound by a larger transverse wound or was he part of the coverup?[/SIZE]
[/SIZE]Anthony DeFiore Wrote:I am sorry Herb, but I can not accept your ideas. They are flawed. If you study Cyril Wecht and Henry Lee's work on the direction of blood splatter, you will be on to your answer. The speed of the bullet. Avoid the mustard packets.
Herbert Blenner Wrote:Anthony DeFiore Wrote:Herb, How about "back and to the left"? I don't need to be Henry Lee to know that the exit wound would explode the brain and blood debris in the direction that the bullet exited...and covered Officer Hargis with it. The blood and brain debris flooded JFK's back immediately....on the left hand side.
When I stomp on a foil packet of mustard, the mess does not fly in the same or similar direction as my careless foot. Instead the yellow mess rushes out of every new opening in the formerly sealed packet.
Likewise when a bullet penetrates a skull partially filled with cranial fluid and macerated stuffings, the mess exits from every available crack or hole.