06-07-2009, 09:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2009, 09:08 PM by Jan Klimkowski.)
This thread needs to be viewed in the light of post #6 here:
http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...php?t=1703
Particularly Zero Hedge's article entitled "NYSE Halts Transparency, Feels Goldman Program Trading Disclosure Is Unnecessary".
As Zero Hedge states, in the secret, covert, world of programmed trading:
Did the NYSE pull the plug and remove transparency to protect Goldman's ass?
Or because Goldman had pulled out of programmed trading because their source code was a) stolen, or more damagingly to GS, about to exposed as b) corrupt (perhaps for reasons of "front running" its own customers)?
Next question.
What precisely is Goldman Sachs' Supplemental Liquidity Program?
See Zero Hedge here:
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/goldman...n-shares-0
If it is precisely this quant-based, programmed trading, that has been exposed/terminated/pulled, what are the implications for the sham edifices of global financial markets?
Transparency?
Liquidity?
The smoke and mirrors game of pass the toxic parcels holding the global financial system together? :eek:
http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...php?t=1703
Particularly Zero Hedge's article entitled "NYSE Halts Transparency, Feels Goldman Program Trading Disclosure Is Unnecessary".
As Zero Hedge states, in the secret, covert, world of programmed trading:
Quote:Quote:This week's NYSE Program Trading report was very odd: not only because program trading hit 48.6% of all NYSE trading, a record high at least since the NYSE keep tabs of this data, and a data point which in itself was startling enough to cause some serious red flags as I jaunt from village to village in what little is left of Europe's bison country, but what was shocking was the disappearance of the #1 mainstay of complete trading domination (i.e., Goldman Sachs) from not just the aforementioned #1 spot, but the entire complete list. In other words: Goldman went from 1st to N/A in one week.
Did the NYSE pull the plug and remove transparency to protect Goldman's ass?
Or because Goldman had pulled out of programmed trading because their source code was a) stolen, or more damagingly to GS, about to exposed as b) corrupt (perhaps for reasons of "front running" its own customers)?
Next question.
What precisely is Goldman Sachs' Supplemental Liquidity Program?
See Zero Hedge here:
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/goldman...n-shares-0
If it is precisely this quant-based, programmed trading, that has been exposed/terminated/pulled, what are the implications for the sham edifices of global financial markets?
Transparency?
Liquidity?
The smoke and mirrors game of pass the toxic parcels holding the global financial system together? :eek:
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war