Edwin Ekdahl's height

[David Josephs]

I assume the question of Edwin A Ekdahl's height is an effort to compare the relative height of a person known as Marguerite Francis Claverie Pic Oswald Ekdahl. If so, I am curious as to any side by side comparison photographs being available showing "Lee's" mother and "Harvey's" mother. According to IMDb, Marguerite Francis Claverie/Pic/Oswald/Ekdahl died on January 17, 1981, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
:hock::

Wish we had that picture, but it probably doesn't exist. Here, though, is a picture of short Marguerite looking up at short Marina.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5825[/ATTACH]

For one, she is not looking "up" at Marina, unless she is cross-eyed, she is looking behind Marina. As I said before, people shrink with age. I am certain you already knew that. We also cannot see the whole person. Marguerite looks like she is stooped to me. There is also perspective to take into account. Without that perspective, you would have to judge the man in the white hat to be also rather short, since sans perspective, he looks only a few inches taller than Marguerite.

Please look at the pic of the other Marguerite and try to convince anyone this is the same person. The lack of resemblance is beyond stunning. You also have yet to reply to the question asked first by Jim Hargrove, then DJ then me (twice). Have you READ Harvey and Lee? It is a simple yes or no question.
Dawn

No Dawn.. he has not...obviously. Nor the notebooks, nor the documents on the CD that comes with the book...

He makes arguments about tonsils and heights (the stems of leaves rather than the tree itself) and thinks we are going to applaud him for his insights and debating abilities like the 1 moderator and 3 members at his "forum"... (which doesn't even qualify as a minyan to sit shiva).

He offers carbon copy FBI reports referencing the wrong years and does so with pride.... and only opinions about people who MAY have done this or COULD have done that since he can't see it any other way... or offer any evidence to support them.

THIS is the type of person we want discussing the case here? A man who needs yet another to fend for him and plead that we accept his bona fides cause he's done something elsewhere that was equally as weak...?

I may be channeling Charles here ... and I do so gladly...

he needs to

::gtfo::