28-03-2014, 10:09 PM
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5832[/ATTACH]
This is the figure given in inches for Oswald's height in PS 44 records.
According to Armstrong, the figure is 64".
I say - as does everyone I have shown it to - says it is 54"
No-one writes a "6" with a downward stroke - stops - then goes up and around for the loop. A "6" is written by doing the loop as part of the initial downward stoke.
54" = 4' 6". Either Armstrong needs to change this person from "Lee" to "Harvey" - or take the saner approach and admit Lee was NOT 5' 4" in NYC and that there probably was no "Harvey" because we can now see Lee's ACTUAL height matches and fits with all other data.
This is the figure given in inches for Oswald's height in PS 44 records.
According to Armstrong, the figure is 64".
I say - as does everyone I have shown it to - says it is 54"
No-one writes a "6" with a downward stroke - stops - then goes up and around for the loop. A "6" is written by doing the loop as part of the initial downward stoke.
54" = 4' 6". Either Armstrong needs to change this person from "Lee" to "Harvey" - or take the saner approach and admit Lee was NOT 5' 4" in NYC and that there probably was no "Harvey" because we can now see Lee's ACTUAL height matches and fits with all other data.