29-03-2014, 10:00 PM
Mitchell Severson Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Would it generate more interest in my thread if I called people morons and inbreds and offered to eviscerate people?
Fair point.
Rather than more posts, I should have stated more topics. Even if they don't generate that much interest, it's worthwhile exposure to a contrary point of view. I just don't have any interest in believing or repeating invalid arguments or shoddy evidence, whether they be Armstrong's, Lifton's, Lane's, Garrison's, or Parker's. In mainstream academia, you need to see other professionals confirm or refute the research of others. If some of the Armstrong evidence is hashed out here at DPF and a few supporting arguments from a thousand page book are thrown out, aren't we all the better for it?
Absolutely, Mitchell. I was just making a joke when I enquired about generating more interest for my thread.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964