30-03-2014, 08:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-03-2014, 08:22 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Greg R Parker Wrote:Cool. It passes with you. It doesn't with me simply because there is zero evidence he actually was 5'4" as a 12 year old - which as you yourself discovered, placed him in the 97th percentile in height for his age and sex. Put another way... he should have been taller than 97% of his peers. And he just flat out wasn't.
As for saying that a lot of z grade movie stuff did in fact go in the assassination... well what can I say? That's really how you explain something when you don't have a rational explanation.
No, no, no, Mr Parker. You committed a logical violation there. You cannot mix an abstract reason with a physical one. The 64 is clearly a 64. What the reason is for that is separate from the fact it clearly says "64", though I agree it does raise interesting questions about how possible it was for Oswald to be 5 foot 4 at 12 years of age. I'm not sure exactly how to read that average height chart or how it relates to Oswald who was not in the upper percentile for average height but was instead slightly below it. Curious. Meanwhile Oswald's Marine record shows a height of 69 inches or 5 foot 9. That was supposedly at 17 years of age when he enlisted. Any chance this is evidence that another slightly older person was measured at PS 44?
Would the doctor or nurse who was practiced at taking these measurements on school boys make such a mistake?
Don't be coy Parker, the confirmed doubles in Dallas is z grade movie stuff and beyond.
.