09-04-2014, 11:14 PM
Greg R Parker Wrote:Your problem is in insisting records are never wrong for benign reasons. But here, you are simply adding to the confusion they already caused. The wound just above the elbow was not the wound of entry. It was where the bullet was removed. The one we are talking about is the entrance wound.
And your problem is that you are just making shit up. The wound of ENTRY was just above the elbow.
The physician's "NARRATIVE SUMMARY" of the shooting incident, prepared by First
Assistant Dr. R. Guthrie, reads (my emphasis):
"This 18-year-old male accidentally shot himself in the left arm with a side-
arm, reportedly of .22 caliber. Examination revealed the wound of entrance in
the medial portion of the upper left arm, just above the elbow.
If that's not good enough for you, here's a Navy document also showing that the ENTRY WOUND WAS JUST ABOVE THE LEFT ELBOW. I've highlighted the essential words to make this concept easier for you.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5879[/ATTACH]
ATTN MODERATORS: Does the kind of "research" Parker is doing strike you as serious work? He sure makes a lot of posts, and he sure manages to mangle the facts. This seems like an enormous waste of time.