Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pulitzers Given On Snowden Coverage
#1
LA Times announced Washington Post reporters to receive Pulitzer Prizes for coverage on Snowden.



This makes me ask isn't there a serious disconnect between the US government hunting Snowden and even wanting to kill him and the fact coverage over his exposure of crimes the US government committed and hid from the public is considered worthy of journalistic reward? Isn't there something that conspicuously doesn't quite add up or whose ends don't connect there?


Don't the LA Times and Washington Post, both newspapers known for not too aggressively pursuing the information and evidence Snowden did (and a big part of the reason he did it in the first place), feel a little short-hemmed here perhaps? Maybe to the point of knickers showing? Who is going to do the tallying here as far as interpretation? So America is a place where we now both praise and jail our heroes? Who are the big ugly elephants in this formula?

So when those Nazis bump-off Snowden with their new secret Nazi laws that allow them to assassinate Snowden by Special Forces death squad with no accounting how exactly does that play?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Pulitzers Given On Snowden Coverage - by Albert Doyle - 14-04-2014, 11:49 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Early NSA and others coverage Magda Hassan 1 2,843 05-07-2013, 07:01 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)