02-05-2014, 11:33 PM
The problem with arguing about the "acccuracy" of the weapon is that even if it is the worst gun in the world and Oswald a terrible shot, it still doesn't rule him out as the Lone Gunman. He could have been shooting at trees (first shot may have come z160 while the trees obscured view) or birds in the sky, or aiming at Mary Moorman, or nothing in particular, and still killed JFK. What rules him out as a Lone Gunman is proving that the bullet (whole or bits) weren't fired from "his" rifle at all.
Ballistically, CE 399 is either the wrong size or the wrong shape (depending upon which photo you care to examine), and the rifling marks are demonstrably wrong for any bullet fired from the M-C 91/38. This means, at best, that the FBI botched the forensics (and then covered it up), and at worst fabricated CE 399 (and then committed perjury). The only way for that gun to have shot those bullets is if the gun is a wholly unique (probably custom-made) firearm with non-standard barrel size and riflings, and that has been machined and stamped to look like a mail order mil-surplus M-C 91/38. And then, improperly fitted with a crappy scope.
Ballistically, CE 399 is either the wrong size or the wrong shape (depending upon which photo you care to examine), and the rifling marks are demonstrably wrong for any bullet fired from the M-C 91/38. This means, at best, that the FBI botched the forensics (and then covered it up), and at worst fabricated CE 399 (and then committed perjury). The only way for that gun to have shot those bullets is if the gun is a wholly unique (probably custom-made) firearm with non-standard barrel size and riflings, and that has been machined and stamped to look like a mail order mil-surplus M-C 91/38. And then, improperly fitted with a crappy scope.