15-07-2009, 01:52 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:[quote=Paul Rigby] Paul, I like you and like your general take on the fate of the Panet in the bloody hands of the worst humans, but on this we have to agree to disagree. I believe this is a psyop to divert. There have been many many others...in fact we have now postively identified about 40 of the 4 gunmen!
The respect and affection for shared stances on any number of issues is reciprocated. Nor do I for one moment believe I have the full story. But I do insist that the kernel of this plot comprises a very simple, traditional and straightforward action -a man with hand-gun firing from close range at surprised and unprotected target. As Rabin and Benazir Bhutto were to discover to their cost.
Part of the problem, I suspect, lies in an unvoiced and unexamined assumption among even the best of the critics - that the plot's core was as sophisticated and nuanced as both their own personalities, and the cover up. (The latter was all that and more.)
We have been steered, deliberately and with consumate skill, down a series of miserably narrow and predetermined channels - let's break out of these ruts, and look again at where we're going, and how.
Paul