10-05-2014, 01:07 AM
Drew, Tracy - those appear like some interesting speculations for sure... yet only speculation... (Drew, you can perform photogrammetry? plesae do share your results as I think the following proves pretty conclusively that the BYP rifle is not the TSBD rifle:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5976[/ATTACH]
Now the question to ask yourself... in 1976 the Dee White 133-C image was discovered. In 1991 5 more images of BYPs are found in DPD files.
1 image is an empty BYP that exactly matches the original BYPs
2 show a cutout of the pose from 133-C
2 are of DPD Bobby Brown posing in the 133-C pose...
How, if 133-C of Oswald in a completely different pose than 133-A or B, did the DPD know to put Brown in that pose in 1963 or to cut out "Oswald" from 2 of them in the same exact pose no one knew about, other than maybe Roscoe White, until 1976?
This is an overlay of 133-C and a photocopy of the BYP the DPD had in 1963/64. They can't even be lined up... and the cutout has a drop shadow
Any ideas?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5977[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5976[/ATTACH]
Now the question to ask yourself... in 1976 the Dee White 133-C image was discovered. In 1991 5 more images of BYPs are found in DPD files.
1 image is an empty BYP that exactly matches the original BYPs
2 show a cutout of the pose from 133-C
2 are of DPD Bobby Brown posing in the 133-C pose...
How, if 133-C of Oswald in a completely different pose than 133-A or B, did the DPD know to put Brown in that pose in 1963 or to cut out "Oswald" from 2 of them in the same exact pose no one knew about, other than maybe Roscoe White, until 1976?
This is an overlay of 133-C and a photocopy of the BYP the DPD had in 1963/64. They can't even be lined up... and the cutout has a drop shadow
Any ideas?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5977[/ATTACH]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter