16-07-2009, 06:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 16-07-2009, 07:46 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
Charles Drago Wrote:Paul Rigby Wrote:Actually, CD, it was me, not Peter, who insisted the assassinations were carried out in plain site - a point with which you clearly agree.
You declare the obvious with an air of discovery. The deaths occured in plain sight; the instruments of those deaths were not readily visible.
Paul Rigby Wrote:Greer benefited from the fact the assassination site was at the end of the parade, at a relatively unpopulated site. He was further shield by the terrain, and the other vehicles in the motorcade. RFK's killer, by contrast, boasted the "sophisticated camouflage" of the victim's body; and was inevitably, like Greer, also seen shooting.
"Shielded"??? Greer was in full view of any number of bystanders and photographers during the shooting sequence.
Are we both talking about the events in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas, at 12:30 PM on November 22, 1963? I know that I am.
As for RFK's killer: Please identify this person. It was not SBS. It was not Thane Eugene Cesar.
Paul Rigby Wrote:Now if you were more familiar with the fuller exposition of the Elm St shooting scenario which centers on Greer, you'd know that it, too, posits (a) decoy shot(s), only this time from the rear[.]
I'm quite familiar with the likely shooting scenario -- and now, thanks to you, with another fantasy version to join those of the WC and HSCA.
Of course at least one decoy shot was fired -- a fact which has zero probative value in terms of your hypothesis.
Paul Rigby Wrote:Altgens' photograph, which was taken about three seconds after the decoy shot was fired, when enlarged (Fig. 3-4) shows Secret Service agent Warren W. Taylor, in the rear left seat, of the Vice-President's follow-up car. His arm is outside of the open car door; the configuration of his hand suggests he is holding a gun. Those people in the car immediately behind smelled gunpowder.
Again, zero probative value for your case. And I have no problem whatsoever with the suggestion that Taylor was a co-conspirator.
See Evica's "Terrible Sound" essay for a truly rational and deep political analysis of the "firecracker," its origins and functions.
Yes, CD got my point, but I think you failed to get it. While the executions were public the real shooters, the real means, the real magic tricks were done with deception and misdirection. Almost everyone in DP was looking at JFKs limo. RFK was shot in the kitchen where it was crowded and confused and few had their attention on him. Etc. While it is not impossible to imagine a scenario of the driver doing it, I find NO evidence this happened and it being the most dangerous of possible plans. By the way there is a book that posits a shot from the trunk, with the assassin in it....but both are IMO diversions from the real tricks that day.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass

