Discrediting Secret Service complicity in the elimination of JFK…

[Peter Lemkin]

Yes, CD got my point, but I think you failed to get it. While the executions were public the real shooters, the real means, the real magic tricks were done with deception and misdirection.

Ok, Pete, let's take that final sentence and interrogate it.

What does it mean? What are these "real magic tricks...done with deception and misdirection"? Isn't that just a rather fancy way of saying there was some elementary misdirection ie distractions shots? Supplemented, say, by some planted witnesses and some fake films? Is there not a real danger in using terminology which renders this an occult event, beyond the powers of mere human comprehension and description? We are, after all, dealing with the actions of men, not demons.

Almost everyone in DP was looking at JFKs limo.

Not according to the Z-fake...

RFK was shot in the kitchen where it was crowded and confused and few had their attention on him.

Isn't that a bit of a cheat? Everyone looks at the target when it suits, but doesn't when it doesn't? And isn't it true that things only became "confused" when the shooting began?

While it is not impossible to imagine a scenario of the driver doing it, I find NO evidence this happened and it being the most dangerous of possible plans.

Ok, let's have a look at that last sentence: Why is it most dangerous of possible plans? An assassin who controls the speed of his intended victim, as a driver-assassin does, is no small advantage. Shooting from within the car avoids a number of major potential pitfalls, from interposed pedestrians and motorcylists, to detection by accident. It also fixes the range of shot, and confines the target's movements. These are huge, practical advantages over any external shooter hypothesis.

By the way there is a book that posits a shot from the trunk, with the assassin in it....but both are IMO diversions from the real tricks that day.

I remember it, and bloody awful rubbish it was, too.

Paul

This is really a bee in your bonnet, isn't it. You don't think it is a bit too potentially dangerous [that others not in the know might see and tell] if the driver turns-around and summarily shoots JFK in the head? Where are the reports of such from any witnesses - some within inches of such an event? The only 'film' that shows anything of the kind is a much later doctored version of a previously doctored film...sort of wheels within wheels in order to, IMO, discredit researchers generally and film alternation, specifically. There were, the best I think the consensus can currently be set at, several shots from several different places - some missing - some hitting, but not from the driver [who may well have been complicit for his actions slowing down, and other events before and after. I still see no evidence that to me is credible - even if one can invent such a scenario. One could as well with Connelly or even Jackie as the assassin - or even the Babuska Lady. Let's stick with the evidence and the majority of eye and ear witnesses. The above, possible to imagine, but all with no supporting evidence and less tactical logic, IMO, all seem to fall into the 'assassin in the trunk [boot]' genre. Sorry. Precious few researchers buy this 'one', but if it is your reason d'etre....may you find some company on that lonely quest. It won't be me.