08-06-2014, 06:06 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:If I wasn't a pacifist, I'd advance Nixon's name as one of those 'leaders' who really deserved something like that.....some self-incriminating evidence....
White House tape recordings, April 25, 1972:
President Nixon: How many did we kill in Laos?
National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger: In the Laotian thing, we killed about ten, fifteen [thousand] …
Nixon: See, the attack in the North [Vietnam] that we have in mind … power plants, whatever's left POL [petroleum], the docks … And, I still think we ought to take the dikes out now. Will that drown people?
Kissinger: About two hundred thousand people.
Nixon: No, no, no … I'd rather use the nuclear bomb. Have you got that, Henry?
Kissinger: That, I think, would just be too much.
Nixon: The nuclear bomb, does that bother you? … I just want you to think big, Henry, for Christsakes.
May 2, 1972:
Nixon: America is not defeated. We must not lose in Vietnam. … The surgical operation theory is all right, but I want that place bombed to smithereens. If we draw the sword, we're gonna bomb those bastards all over the place. Let it fly, let it fly.
Quote:"Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business." Michael Ledeen, former Defense Department consultant and holder of the Freedom Chair at the American Enterprise Institute
Who pulled Nixon back from the brink? Henry the K, of all people?
Kissinger had/has more than enough blood on his hands! - he just was not totally insane enough to go along with using Nuclear Bombs on a developing nation who had never attacked the US. Nixon was totally insane - but in that regard, he was hardly the only recent President to fall into that category....::face.palm::
Kissinger was also targeted for a farewell party.