04-11-2008, 02:48 PM
Personally speaking, I am quite certain Diana was assassinated. Proof, of course, is a different thing.
A friend of mine who made several ITV3 documentaries about the "accident" was in little doubt that there was foul play - and was told or was hinted at - that those people involved with "defence of the Realm" were responsible.
I can imagine that a combination of reasons accrued to ensure compelling action was taken -- the land mines issue, embarrassing the royal family with a Muslim relationship etc. But not least I suspect, was her having effective psychological control over defining the attitudes of her two boys --- the king's-in-waiting.
A friend of mine who made several ITV3 documentaries about the "accident" was in little doubt that there was foul play - and was told or was hinted at - that those people involved with "defence of the Realm" were responsible.
I can imagine that a combination of reasons accrued to ensure compelling action was taken -- the land mines issue, embarrassing the royal family with a Muslim relationship etc. But not least I suspect, was her having effective psychological control over defining the attitudes of her two boys --- the king's-in-waiting.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14