Operation forty pic

[Michael Cross]

I know Plumlee well and met with him for many years. I have photos of him from all through his life. That is him...and he has admitted it is him [but that alone doesn't absolutely mean it is so!!!] He has named the date and the occasion to me - and even that Hopsicker got wrong or was told wrong. Eye color/shade is the easiest thing to tamper with in a photo and we know how intelligence-related photos can be tampered with - but can also just change with ambient lighting and flash, etc. Besides, knowing the nature of the meeting and the others there, Plumlee would fit, and Sturgis would not. In your google search url above, even that photo is listed! Check out the hairline and face structure. If it is not Plumlee, it is someone other than Sturgis...but my bet and belief and word from Plumlee is it is Plumlee.
Plumlee
Sturgis

I suppose Franks droopy eyes and sitting next to Gonzalez! Has nothing to do with Frank in this photo, when in-fact Plumlee didn't even know Gonzalez yet right? Tell me, why do you, Peter, Dawn and Drew not see that? Why do you keep overing looking the facts? You still have not answered my question Peter is it because you have some kind of vested interest in Tosh being in this photo, I can then understand why your only argument of your facts is "He told me so" and that's good enough for you and Dawn? Remind me to never ask either one of you to do any research from me! Gee wizz.

Thanks for those photos Scott. The shape of the area where the forehead and nose merge - including the transition to the eyebrows - does not look like Sturgis to me. Layman's opinion though. Much more like Plumlee.