Ralph Yates

[Bob Prudhomme]

The odds of this kind of incident happening by coincidence are somewhat incredible, to say the least. I read an old thread on the Ed Forum where our "friend" went to great lengths to discredit Ralph Yates. David Josephs posted the FBI Dempsey Jones report and pointed out the significance of it to our friend. For the next several pages, our friend and David von Pain had it out with the great researcher Sean Murphy, tag teaming poor Sean and throwing everything but the kitchen sink at him. Unfortunately for this pair, Mr. Murphy has more debating talent in his little finger than the two of them together can produce, and he basically handed their butts to them.

One thing I found strange; during the course of this thread, both our friend and DVP used many similar phrases in their posts, such as "C'mon, Sean". Just another coincidence?

Most informative Bob! And one reason we don't have the lone nutters here. Too much time wasted dealing with their designed and circular crap. We want to case to move forward not get stuck going over and over the same discredited red herrings. The work of researchers can and should be tested by other researchers but only those with good intentions of progressing our understanding not that of blocking, denying and disappearing the evidence found.

I have never understood why people like DVP were encouraged to troll at the EF. People like him in my opinion are paid to infiltrate such forums. Let's face it, lone nutters just don't go on forums. They have zero interest in this case. They accept the official version and don't read books which challenge the lie. Conversely those who spend their life advocating the WC position are a very suspect lot. Glad we don't have 'em here.

How do we know we don't have them (or have had them) on this forum, Dawn? Trolls come in all shapes and sizes, and some actually pass themselves off as CT's, all the while working at the disruption of affairs at a JFK forum. I could give some examples but I'm afraid there is no way of doing so without being slanderous.