Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Panopticon of global surveillance

NSA chief knew of Snowden file destruction by Guardian in UK

Revelation contrasts markedly with White House efforts to distance itself from UK government pressure to destroy disks!


[Image: General-Keith-Alexander-N-011.jpg] General Keith Alexander, who was NSA director at the time the Guardian destroyed files from Edward Snowden. Photograph: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

General Keith Alexander, the then director of the NSA, was briefed that the Guardian was prepared to make a largely symbolic act of destroying documents from Edward Snowden last July, new documents reveal.
The revelation that Alexander and Obama's director of national intelligence, James Clapper, were advised on the Guardian's destruction of several hard disks and laptops contrasts markedly with public White House statements that distanced the US from the decision.
White House and NSA emails obtained by Associated Press under freedom of information legislation demonstrate how pleased Alexander and his colleagues were with the developments. At times the correspondence takes a celebratory tone, with one official describing the anticipated destruction as "good news".
On 20 July 2013, three Guardian editors destroyed all copies of the its Snowden material held in London (video), under the supervision of two GCHQ staff following a period of intense political pressure in the UK.




Link to video: Revealed: the day Guardian destroyed Snowden hard drives under watchful eye of GCHQ The decision to destroy the UK copies of the material was taken in a climate of advancing legal threats from Cabinet Office and intelligence officials. The Guardian and its publishing partners, which included the New York Times and the not-for-profit news organisation ProPublica, held other copies of the material in the US, and continued reporting revelations from the documents.
When the Guardian revealed it had destroyed several computers a month later in August, the White House spokesman Josh Earnest initially remarked it was hard to "evaluate the propriety of what they did based on incomplete knowledge of what happened" but said it would be hard to imagine the same events occurring in the US.
"That's very difficult to imagine a scenario in which that would be appropriate," he concluded.
However, heavily redacted email correspondence obtained by AP reporter Jack Gillum shows senior NSA officials celebrating the destruction of the material, even before it had occurred.
An email to Alexander from Rick Ledgett, now deputy director of the NSA, has the subject line "Guardian data being destroyed", and is dated 19 July, a day before the destruction of the files. Most is heavily redacted, but Ledgett remarks: "Good news, at least on this front."
A day later, hours after the material was destroyed, Alexander follows up with Ledgett, asking: "Can you confirm this actually occurred?"
Later that day, Clapper emails Alexander under the same subject line, saying: "Thanks Keith … appreciate the conversation today".
The remainder of the emails are redacted, including the subject lines in many cases, meaning it is unclear who from the British government briefed the senior NSA and White House staff on the destruction, or whether US officials had any input to the decision to encourage destruction of journalistic material.
A spokeswoman for the Guardian said the revelation of the US-UK correspondence on the destruction was disappointing.
"We're disappointed to learn that cross-Atlantic conversations were taking place at the very highest levels of government ahead of the bizarre destruction of journalistic material that took place in the Guardian's basement last July," she said. "What's perhaps most concerning is that the disclosure of these emails appears to contradict the White House's comments about these events last year, when they questioned the appropriateness of the UK government's intervention."
The NSA and GCHQ declined to respond to AP's requests for comment on the email exchange.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Panopticon of global surveillance - by Peter Lemkin - 13-07-2014, 06:16 AM
Panopticon of global surveillance - by R.K. Locke - 14-02-2015, 07:26 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dumbo : how the CIA blind surveillance cameras Magda Hassan 0 35,318 14-08-2017, 12:16 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  HR 658 Authorizes 30.000 surveillance drones over the USA - to be increased! Peter Lemkin 8 20,051 31-01-2017, 02:50 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  AP Sues US Gov’t over Fake FBI News Article Booby Trapped with Surveillance Virus Magda Hassan 0 6,898 06-12-2015, 02:39 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  The Limits of The Panopticon Magda Hassan 0 6,403 22-11-2015, 07:41 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance David Guyatt 485 193,601 13-12-2014, 10:08 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  'Five Eyes' surveillance pact should be published, Strasbourg court told Magda Hassan 1 5,066 09-09-2014, 09:34 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Defensive Shift - Turning the Tables on Surveillance Magda Hassan 0 4,531 26-08-2014, 03:14 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Surveillance Capitalism Magda Hassan 0 4,096 05-07-2014, 02:44 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Biggest anti-mass surveillance event in the U.K. Magda Hassan 2 7,682 12-06-2014, 10:05 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Secret EU surveillance drone project revealed David Guyatt 0 5,231 12-02-2014, 09:43 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)