15-07-2014, 07:04 PM
I recall that Oswald's rifle had a crown marking but don't recall a "FAT." It also had a "40" on it for year of manufacture but was lacking the Fascist stamp XVIII (for the 18th year of Fascist Rule) although there are faint marks that might have been the start of a Roman Numeral, that had been almost completely machined off.
Wouldn't the 91/41 been considerably longer than the 91/38?
Wouldn't the 91/41 been considerably longer than the 91/38?
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."