17-07-2014, 06:39 PM
I have also lost track of the argument here.
To be clear, I think the idea of LBJ as a sponsor is absurd, and that Mac Wallace was not on the 6th floor of the TSBD. There would be absolutely no need for him to be there, and no need to further implicate LBJ by the presence of a single fingerprint. If anyone can present a compelling argument to the contrary then I'm all ears.
To be clear, I think the idea of LBJ as a sponsor is absurd, and that Mac Wallace was not on the 6th floor of the TSBD. There would be absolutely no need for him to be there, and no need to further implicate LBJ by the presence of a single fingerprint. If anyone can present a compelling argument to the contrary then I'm all ears.
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy,
― Leo Tolstoy,