03-08-2014, 08:09 PM
From the link you courteously provided, it appears as if the NTSB's denial of a request to re-open the investigation is being appealed to a federal court. With a real appointed judge and everything. Appeals are adversarial in nature too.
Certainly, if you are asking a branch of government to change its previously made and publicized findings in an official investigation, you can expect them to defend their original findings.
Certainly, if you are asking a branch of government to change its previously made and publicized findings in an official investigation, you can expect them to defend their original findings.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."

