Can't find diagram of shots to jfk from conspiracy point of view?

[Peter Lemkin]

I find the single bullet diagram very easily on the net but i have not been able to find a diagram with the shots coming from both the front and back with the adjusted locations contrary to the sbt theory...Is this due to the internet being filtered or lack of diagrams from a conspiracy point of view?....Though i have read many booms i dont recall where and if i have found any diagrams opposing the SBT diagram which we always see any thought please reply im still looking for the true accurate diagram of the incoming shots.

"truly accurate diagram" of the incoming shots....I have many - no ONE is on the mark in any one's book - because few agree on exactly where the and how many shooters there were. That said, a little work on your part will land you several theoretical maps - and you'll have to decide for yourself which likely happened and which not. I'm sure there was at least one, likely two shooters from the grassy knoll area; two shooters from the TSBD, one from the Dal-Tex building and a very likely shot from the South Knoll. There might well have been yet one other shot from none of those positions, but closer in to the limo. But others who've studied the case for many decades would quibble over one or two of what I just outlined - or the location and identity [not to mention evidence for] these shooters. Personally, I long ago lost some interest in the detailed subject of bullets, rifles and shooters - after I satisfied myself there were many more than in the official version and that Oswald was not one of them. Someone suggested the plat done by Roberdeau, which has some of the ones I'd subscribe to, but I believe may not have the South Knoll shot I subscribe to. You're going to have to pull up your socks, read a lot [and NOT just on the internet!] and then decide for yourself on matters related to the JFK assassination. I believe if you look on some of the other better websites that contain JFK debates you'll find this one and others.