10-08-2014, 04:38 PM
I will be quite surprised if Nathan reported this. But honestly we never discussed THAT aspect. It really frightened him and I found a way to calm him down which I will not post. (Drew I sent you a PM, did you get it?)
Erick just wandered in to my office with a business card he has had since first meeting Nathan in 98. Or 97, not positive of when we met. Obviously after we met J in Dallas on 11/21/97 outside our hotel room at COPA. (One of my favorite stories).
The card sets out all of Nathan's credentials including his certification number which is (was) 78-468.
For someone to now say that "we knew that" meaning J knew Nathan was not certified is such a bold face lie and a dishonor to both J and to Nathan.
Some throw the term "dear friend" around like it is trash.
Too bad a family of the deceased cannot sue. And how utterly convenient to make such lying claims after the persons are long dead.
Sickened.
Dawn
Erick just wandered in to my office with a business card he has had since first meeting Nathan in 98. Or 97, not positive of when we met. Obviously after we met J in Dallas on 11/21/97 outside our hotel room at COPA. (One of my favorite stories).
The card sets out all of Nathan's credentials including his certification number which is (was) 78-468.
For someone to now say that "we knew that" meaning J knew Nathan was not certified is such a bold face lie and a dishonor to both J and to Nathan.
Some throw the term "dear friend" around like it is trash.
Too bad a family of the deceased cannot sue. And how utterly convenient to make such lying claims after the persons are long dead.
Sickened.
Dawn