06-09-2014, 02:18 AM
Let's pretend for a minute that the target's head is turned to the left of midline and slightly bent forward. Lets assume that the shooter is mostly to the rear of the target and is some distance away (i.e. not a contact wound). Since we are theoretically speaking about the ammunition you described above assume the shooter is armed with a weapon capable of firing that ammunition.
I am not trying to start an argument about the facts of the assassination, just asking a hypothetical.
I am not trying to start an argument about the facts of the assassination, just asking a hypothetical.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."