06-09-2014, 09:02 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:which begs the question, why are the conspirators so smart as to remove frames and yet so stupid as to leave in the two frames of backward head snapping that have convinced 50% of people that the prevailing theory is hogwash?
Hi Drew
I believe this one is surprisingly easy to explain. The reason most people believe JFK was driven "back and to the left" is because this is what Jim Garrison told us happened, and most people have not thought it out beyond this.
In my perspective, viewing the Zapruder film, I see a very short and brief recoil of JFK`s head at the time of the head shot, something I have seen many times hunting. I then see JFK`s limp form, stiffened by the back brace, falling toward Jackie. I do not believe the explosive force of the bullet arresting in his skull was capable of driving him over onto the seat.
It may never have occurred to the conspirators that JFK`s lifeless form falling to the left would be interpreted as Garrison interpreted it.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964