Can't find diagram of shots to jfk from conspiracy point of view?

[William Charleston]

William: You probably shouldn't base a significant leg of a conspiracy theory on the premise that "CE 399 was planted at Parkland." There are serious questions about the stretcher bullet's origin, chain of custody, and even its' shape. The single most important fact to remember about CE 399 is that the first four people to allegedly handle it could not or would not subsequently agree that CE 399 was the stretcher bullet.

It is far more likely that CE 399 was never in Dallas at all, but originated at the FBI shooting range.

It is unlikely that any whole bullet went into Connally's thigh. The wound is described by treating doctors as being caused by a bullet fragment.

The position of the microphone in 1978 doesn't answer my question. The problem with the acoustic evidence, beyond the other Trade Mart noises, Sheriff Decker's voice, and sirens on the tape, is that no police officer (especially H.B. McClain, the officer with the "stuck mike") in 1963 was at the proper position to record it at that time. The Dorman, Couch and Wegner films are pictures of his position, far to the rear of where the sounds could have been recorded. If you have done a serious study of this aspect of the case, you also know that H.B. McClain (AFTER listening to the recording) denied that that recording originated from his motorcycle.

The problem with the acoustic evidence [B]is that no police officer in 1963 was at the proper position to record it at that time.[/B]

Dale Myers was featured on an ABC news 2 hour special on the 40th anniversary BEYOND CONSPIRACY (and other "documentaries) as having proved that the motorcycle could not have been in the correct position to have recorded the shots as predicted by the acoustical analysis. Myers by coordinating several of the amateur films PROVED the motorcycle wasn't in right place. The program then reasoned that since nothing else is credible, then the SBT must be true.

It turns out it is easy to prove that Dale Myers' work is absolute BS, just like his computer animation that shows the SBT is valid. Why did ABC and others feature Dale Myers' BS presentations? Because ABC news will broadcast anything that makes the US government's fairy tales and lies seem to be true.

[video=vimeo;92452333]https://vimeo.com/92452333[/video]


https://vimeo.com/92452333

NOTE: I did make a minor error on the video. I said that is Jim Towner (about 2 min) stepping on to the curb. Tina Towner has told me that was not her father.

What I did differently than Myers was to synchronize the Zapruder film and the Dorman film for what he says was the third and last shot. Then when I play the Dorman film with the Zapruder film on the same screen synchronized as he said it happened, it shows the same person in different places simultaneously, obviously proving Dale Myers synchronization is incorrect.

I say in the video that Myers is off not only by the time it takes Rosemary Willis to run from where she is seen in the Dorman film to her position in the Zapruder film, he is off by the time between the first shot to the last shot which gives the motorcycle plenty of time to be in the correct position for the final two shots. As you may know, only the grassy knoll 4th shot was carefully analyzed.

As you probably know, echo correlation analysis must ""know" the position of the microphone and the shooter. Rings were drawn around each microphone to show that the microphone (ie. motorcycle) was within that ring when the shot was fired. Test shots were fired from the grassy knoll and the TSBD.

If you look at Bugliosi's RECLAIMING HISTORY, you'll see that the audio experts wanted to fire more test shots with the microphones grouped closer together to give them better data but the US government said they ran out of money! Think about it, the audio experts had a chance to nail the problem to take each shot from 50/50 chance type data to using microphones closer together which would have given far better data.

What I did differently than the HSCA audio experts is that I said if the time between shots is the same in BOTH the Z film and the audio analysis, it means statistically that the sounds of the shots were recorded. Echo correlation analysis is difficult but matching the time between shots is rather trivial IF you understand and correct the errors made by the HSCA and others. FOR EXAMPLE, you must be able to understand why the HSCA said 4 shots when I show a figure that has 5 shots.

I am sure you agree that the time between shots #3 and #4 is the same as the time from Zapruder frame 224 to 313 (4.8 seconds). What are the odds that the audio experts were using random noise and they showed the same time between two shots as the Zapruder film shows? And it wasn't just any two shots, the Z313 shot as you may know is the one that the second team of audio experts said was fired from the grassy knoll (with a probility of 95% or better). So by aligning the shot in the audio analysis that was fired from in front with the JFK head shot, we find the audio analysis predicts a shot was fired 4.8 seconds before and 0.7 seconds after JFK's head shot.

What are the odds that the most probable microphone would go around the corner on to Elm at the same speed as the limousine AND in the correct order (they calculated speed based on the most probable microphone and the distance/time to the next shot, that speed was approximately the same as the limo!).



I am sure you understand that the audio experts were using equations to match the echo patterns on the actual police recording with the test shot recording. The only alternative to the hypothesis that the tape did record the sounds of the shots is that the audio experts got lucky. That is silly to think that is true.

I don't show on this video that there is enough time for the police motorcycle to get to the position of the motorcycle predicted by the acoustical analysis but it could easily get there (there is no photographic proof but there is mathematical proof). As you may know, Rosemary Willis is on record as saying she thought the first sound she heard was a gunshot and she stopped running almost immediately. That is also consistent with the acoustical evidence/Zapruder film alignment which shows shot #1 as Z178 and we see Rosemary Willis starting to stop a few frames after that time.

Now to one of the most important points:
1. The HSCA showed that there is evidence that a shot was fired from in front of the limousine.
2. The audio evidence indicates it is almost the last shot fired.

If you wanted to know the truth, anyone with an IQ approaching room temperature would align the Z film and the audio evidence to show the frontal shot aligned as JFK's head shot. BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT THE US GOVERNMENT DID! They showed the last shot fired from behind as the one that hit JFK and the frontal shot as a split second BEFORE JFK is shot in the head! The next video might make it clearer why they played this game. IF THE AUDIO ANALYSIS IS CORRECT, it PROVES the US Government lied and forged evidence to hide the truth. The gubermint could not let you know the audio evidence is valid and the presstitutes are too ignorant to figure it out. To fool Americans, you only have to fool the press.




I made several significant mistakes in this video but it was for the purpose of running this by several people to "see what they thought." But that was 2009 but it presents the misalignment of the Z film and the acoustical analysis.

William

Now THAT was funny; "...anyone with an IQ approaching room temperature..."

Everywhere we look in this case, the evidence is sitting right there in front of the government. It is either ignored or denied, or investigations cease because the US government "runs out of money" or some such thing.

I may disagree with you on the odd minor point but, overall, you are doing excellent work.

To pull off this scam called the JFK assassination, they had to do several things:

1. The witnesses had to be neutered and ignored.

a. Those who heard BANG-BANG heard echoes.
b. Those who saw a massive hole in the back of JFK's head about 5 inches in diagmeter were mistaken, couldn't see his head because it wasn't examined, weren't medically qualified...
c. A hole in the windshield? The US government's picture of the broken windshield is not consistent with what witnesses say they saw etc.
d. The US government said the Connally's were wrong about John Connally turning to his right and attempting to turn back to his left before he says he was bent over by the force of the bullet to his back. They got you to ignore what he said on everything else but they got many to memorize and believe the point when John Connally says JFK was shot in the head AFTER he was shot in the back.
e. The government goons had to control the press. It's called pack journalism, get the big boys to repeat the lie and everybody else falls into line. CBS (read SEE BS) led the pack in reporting erroneous conclusions.

ETC.

It's one thing to have a hunch that the US government was involved in the JFK assassination but it is something else to prove it.

One of the things I've posted several times:

1. John Connally first reacted after he emerged from behind the Stemmon's sign apparently to a shot seen in frame 224. Another shot was fired at frame Z313 when JFK was hit in the head.

To calculate the time between those two events, you only need to know the film speed which the FBI measured as 18.3 frames per second.

Time (Z224-Z313) = {(313 -224)/18.3} = 4.8 seconds

2. The only other way to determine the time between two shots in the JFK assassination is to use the audio recording that audio experts said recorded the sounds of the shots. You may have a hundred reasons why you are convinced beyond any doubt that it did not record the sounds of the shots but when you look at the time between shots #3 and #4 you also see 4.8 seconds.



What are the odds that audio experts using a recording with random noise (i.e. did not record the sounds of the shots) would get 4.8 seconds for the time between two of the shots? Let's agree not to give numbers at this point but it doesn't seem likely, does it?

The audio experts said they used a technique called echo correlation analysis. They did what the name says, they compared the echo patterns for each shot like echo pattern seen on the actual police recording to the recorded sounds from various microphones along the limousine route that the microphone on a motorcycle would have captured. When they did that and looked for the best match they found that the most probable microphone was separated showing a "speed" of approximately 10 mph just like the limousine was said to have been traveling at. And don't miss the fact that it was 1 2 3 4 5 in sequence going around the corner of Houston on to Elm.

The shooting figure above shows the echo pattern of shot #4, the grassy knoll shot. If you look closely, you'll notice there are numbers on the bigger pulses. The numbers show a match between the actual police recording and the test shooting recording with a shot from the grassy knoll.

I can show witness after witness who said the last two shots were separated a split second apart, BANG-BANG. The audio evidence agrees with them, the last two shots were separated by a split second. What are the odds of that ALSO happening?

The audio recording indicates that shots #1, #3 and #5 were fired from the TSBD. What are the odds of that happening too?

I showed in a previous post that a motorcycle is seen going around the corner from Houston to Elm in the Dorman film. Dale Myers said he proved the shooting was over when the motorcycle rounded the corner. My video shows that a little girl is shown in two different places simultaneously if you use Dale Myers timing which proves his "proof" is many seconds off. I don't show a "more correct" alignment of the Zaprduer film and the Dorman film but when you do that, the motorcycle is rounding the corner about the time of the 3rd shot just as predicted.

Shot #4 was found to match the grassy knoll shot and the audio experts said with a 95% or better probability. That is 4.8 seconds AFTER Connally first reacted at Z224.

Consider just the things I listed:

(5 shots corresponding to Z film timing) AND (3 shots from TSBD) AND (Motorcycle in correct place using photographic evidence rounding corner for shot #3) AND (Shot #4 matches shot from front) (AND motorcycle was traveling at the proper speed). There are more things that can be added to the equation.

Still think the audio recording did NOT record the sounds of the shots?



Once you finally realize the evidence is overwhelming that you were lied to, the question quickly becomes WHO, HOW and WHY. The list of possible "WHO" is very short. They had to have the power to influence/corrupt the investigations and the power to forge evidence. Some of you no matter what you see, what you verify yourself will not believe the US government would lie to you.

It's simple, the valid audio evidence proves the US govenment lied and forged evidence to hide the truth.